Category Archives: Real Estate

Fourclosure Rates Hit Record in Third Quarter

foreclosure-house

The share of homeowners delinquent on their mortgage or in foreclosure hit a new record during the third quarter, according to industry data released Thursday, which also indicates that the problem is likely to get worse through next year as unemployment rates continue to rise.

About 9.6 percent of borrowers were delinquent on their mortgage during the third quarter, according to the survey by the Mortgage Bankers Association, and 4.5 percent more were somewhere in the foreclosure process. Overall, about 14 percent of mortgage loans were delinquent or in the foreclosure process during the quarter, according to the group.

That is the highest level ever recorded by the survey, which has been conducted since 1972. That is up from 9.7 percent of borrowers who were in trouble during the same period last year.

The majority of the problem remains in the Sun Belt states, such as California and Florida, which accounted for about 43.4 percent of the foreclosures started during the third quarter. But loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration are making up a bigger part of the problem also, according to the survey. Of the foreclosures started during the quarter, 10.6 percent were insured by FHA, up from 7.8 percent during the same period last year.

Source Washington Post

Reed Diehl Sentenced to 57 Months in Federal Prison

Reed Diehl
Reed Diehl

Reed Diehl, a former University of California lineman has been sentenced to 57 months in federal prison for his role in a $5 million Ponzi scheme. What’s with all these people getting away with Ponzi schemes?  Anyhow, 57 months in prison, $5 million take, equals a wage of $87,720 a month. Seems like a light sentence for stealing that much money.

According to an FBI press release in July of this year:

SANTA ANA, CA—A former player with the Tennessee Titans pleaded guilty this afternoon to federal fraud charges related to a $5 million Ponzi scheme in which he collected funds with promises of high rates of returns on investments in loan programs, including multimillion dollar condominium projects in Mexico.

Reed Kyle Diehl, 30, of Coto de Caza, pleaded guilty this afternoon in United States District Court to three counts of wire fraud and one count of money laundering.

According to a plea agreement in the case, Diehl falsely represented himself to potential clients as a banker who made “hard money loans” to businesses or individuals. Diehl also admitted that he fraudulently collected deposits for lines of credit for people who desired financing for construction and development projects in Mexico.

In relation to the “hard money loans,” Diehl told investors that he would pool their funds and make secured loans to individuals or businesses that had shortterm cash needs. Instead of using investor funds to make loans, he used investors’ money to repay earlier investors and to fund his lifestyle.

In relation to the second part of his scheme, Diehl told victims involved in construction projects in Mexico that he could secure multimillion dollar lines of credit. Diehl told one victim that it would cost $1.175 million to secure a $24 million loan and that the deposit would be used as collateral for the line of credit. The victim eventually paid Diehl $2.5 million, money that Diehl used to pay, among others things, other people who had made investments with Diehl. None of the victims ever obtained a line of credit through Diehl.

In his plea agreement, Diehl admitted that he caused losses of just over $5 million.

Diehl pleaded guilty before United States District Judge David O. Carter, who is scheduled to sentence the defendant on September 28. At sentencing, Diehl faces a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison for each of the three counts of wire fraud and 10 years in prison for the money laundering count.

Diehl was initially charged and arrested in this case in March 2008. After being freed on bond, Diehl’s bond was revoked in January after he attempted to enter into a real estate transaction for a $3.5 million house using a false name and someone else’s social security number.

The investigation into Diehl was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Remember, if you are promised high returns on your money that seems too good to be true, yep, run for the hills.

Home Sales to Increase 15 Percent in 2010

home-prices-increasing
Home sales will increase 15 percent to about 5.7 million units and REALTOR® income will be up 20 percent in 2010, NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun told a packed room of REALTORS® today in a residential economic update at the 2009 NAR Conference & Expo.

Yun credited the home buyer tax credit with unleashing sales on the lower-end of the housing market this year, bringing up to 400,000 first-time buyers into the market who wouldn’t have bought otherwise. That influx tightened inventories of starter homes, shored up prices, and helped reduce households’ fear over continuing price drops.

This virtuous cycle will continue now that the federal government has extended the credit to mid-2010 and expanded it to make a smaller credit available to repeat buyers and to households with higher incomes. “The key is stabilizing prices and preserving household wealth,” he says.

Yun predicts the supply of homes to stabilize at the historic norm of six to seven months. Homes above $500,000 will remain elevated in the near-term, but that weakness will be offset by a hefty drop in starter-home inventories, which are running at about a five months supply.

The tightening inventory at all price points will help improve market performance by bringing supply into better balance with demand, but the added sales, particularly on the higher end, will also increase the number and quality of the market comparables used by appraisers to assign valuations. Once appraisals improve, foreclosures will ease, blunting their drag on the market and making it less likely that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and even FHA will need help from the taxpayer.

“Then we’ll be set for a durable economic expansion,” he said.

New-home sales, which comprise about 10 percent of the market, will continue at suppressed levels–about 550,000 units, down from more than a million during the boom–mainly because builders have scaled projects way back, in part because financing isn’t available.

“Weakness in new-home sales shouldn’t be viewed as tepid demand,” he said.

Even under the most positive economic scenario, unemployment will remain elevated through 2010. Yun is predicting unemployment to stay near double-digits going into 2011, qualifying this recession, as some economists have, as the “Great Recession.”

Source: Robert Freedman REALTOR® Magazine

Joe Montana’s Vacation Home For Sale For $49 Million

Joe-Montana-Home

Remember when  Joe Montana, former San Francisco quarterback and Hall of Fame quarterback had the art of winning the football game in the last 10 seconds of play? Surprising as he was then, it’s even more surprising that he has a home in Calistoga that he put on the  market for a cool $49 million. Not only that, this home is just a vacation home, not his main residence.

The setting: More than 500 acres in Calistoga, at the north end of the Napa wine country, spilling over into Sonoma County. The “ultra-private property” includes a 9,700-square-foot Tuscan-inspired main residence, “professional-grade” equestrian center, two creeks, a pond, full-sized basketball court, skeet shooting range, caretaker’s residence, guesthouse, pool and spa, gym, Bocce ball court, and a producing olive farm.

The main residence features three bedrooms, 3 1/2 baths, a sitting room/upstairs tower, great room and dining room, loggia, kitchen, breakfast room, media room, office, climate-controlled wine cellar and tasting room, outdoor viewing tower, and two laundry rooms.

“Villa Montana was designed to feel as if it was handed down through the generations,” Jennifer Montana said in a Nov. 9 statement.

The property consists of multiple parcels, which were assembled starting in 1995, said spokeswoman Alyson Pitarre. Joe and Jennifer Montana don’t want to disclose how much they paid for the various parcels, she said. They live in Thousands Oaks, Calif., and have been using the Calistoga estate as a vacation house.

Local real estate agents say if Montana gets even close to his asking price, it will be a record sale for Sonoma County.

Feds Clean Up Closing Costs For Borrowers

piggy bank

It seems that times are getting harder for mortgage brokers. First, they can’t in most cases use their appraiser of choice and now, they have to give you a close estimate of closing costs when you purchase a home.  No longer will you be given an approximate closing cost.  Than find the final closing costs on your mortgage to be $2000 to $3,000 higher than what you were told you would have to pay.

Worse yet, you had to come up with the extra cash to handle the surprise costs or the home purchase or refinancing could not proceed.  A lot of mortgage companies low ball the estimated closing costs just to rope you into doing business with them, than surprise you with extra costs when you are ready to sign the final closing papers.
Here’s what’s about to happen: Starting Jan. 1, loan charges and settlement fees will be spelled out on a revised, more consumer-friendly version of the good-faith estimates (GFE) form that borrowers are supposed to receive within three days of their mortgage applications. Charges will fall into three broad categories on the form:

• Fees that cannot increase from upfront estimates to final closing.

• Fee estimates that come with wiggle room and can increase by as much as 10 percent.

• Fees that can increase without limit, mainly because the lender has no control over them or because the amount is difficult to predict.

Charges in the zero-increase category include the lender’s or broker’s mortgage origination, processing and underwriting charges, where junk fees sometimes sprout — or increase significantly at closing. Also in this category are the lender’s or broker’s loan discount charge, or “points,” based on the interest rate quoted, and local transfer taxes.

Charges subject to a 10 percent aggregate increase include services required by the lender but where the lender chooses the providers, such as appraisals; expenses such as lender’s title insurance and settlement services, where the borrower chooses a firm on a list approved by the lender; owner’s title insurance, when the borrower chooses a company on the lender’s approved list; and recording charges by local governments.

Though any one of these items can increase more than 10 percent from the upfront estimate to closing, the combined total of all the fees in this category cannot jump by more than 10 percent. This is crucial, especially in title insurance and settlement charges, where some of the biggest surprises pop up at closing.

Charges that can increase without limit include lender-required services where the borrowers choose a title insurance, escrow or other settlement company that is not on the lender’s list; the cost of homeowners’ hazard insurance; daily interest charges on the loan; and the amount of the initial deposit by the borrower into an escrow account.

Besides getting rid of closing-cost surprises, the new good-faith estimate encourages loan applicants to shop around before committing. The form has space for comparing up to four competing lenders’ GFEs on interest rates, rate locks, prepayment penalties or balloon payments, among other factors. The cost estimates from each competitor are required to remain available for 10 business days. Interest rates can change unless locked in.

Paired with the new GFE rules will be a new standard closing-cost statement, the “HUD-1,” which allows consumers to directly compare what they were told upfront with what they’re being asked to pay at closing.

Also, for the first time ever, the new HUD-1requires disclosure of the widely misunderstood fee splits of title insurance premiums between the insurance underwriter — the company actually insuring the title — and the title agent, who is often the settlement agent. Consumers may be stunned to learn that in some markets, 80 percent to 90 percent or more of the premium they pay at closing actually goes to the agent, not to pay for the insurance itself.

Extended Tax Credits Signed Into Law

government-tax-credits

Expected to contribute approximately $22 billion to the economy, Congress overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan measure this week extending the $8,000 home buyer tax credit to April 30, 2010.

The legislation, which is part of a larger bill that also extends unemployment benefits, was signed into law by President Obama today.

More people are now eligible to take advantage of the law, which includes a $6,500 tax credit for buyers who are current home owners and have lived in their home for five of the past eight years.

Income limits for eligible home buyers were also expanded to $125,000 for single buyers and $225,000 for couples, up from $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples. Qualifying home prices are capped at $800,000.

NAR’s Government Affairs Division has compiled facts on the changes made to the current tax credit. NAR members sent more than 500,000 letters to leaders in Congress and made nearly 13,000 telephone calls to Senate offices last weekend to encourage support. So far this year, REALTORS® have spent nearly $14 million lobbying Congress, according to federal campaign finance records compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Sen. Johnny Isakson, a Georgia Republican and a former member of NAR, was key in extending the credit, as well as pushing it through initially. Other prominent boosters include the National Association of Homebuilders and the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Listen to NAR President Charles McMillan’s podcast announcement.

NAR economists estimate that approximately 2 million people will take advantage of the tax credit this year.

Realty World, O’Dell Realty Group is Now John O’Dell Realty

Bridgeport Covered Bridge, Nevada County, CA

 

I’m pleased to announce that we are no longer a part of the Realty World, Northern California franchise.  No longer being part of the corporate world, we are back to being your home town real estate company, locally owned and operated. We are also using our original name, O’Dell Realty. Please go to our website John ODell Realty   There you can search for all the  MLS listings, foreclosures or put yourself on a free mailing list of homes with your own criteria to find exactly the home or land that you are looking for.

With the advent of the world wide web, there is no need for being a part of a corporate franchise. Along with our own web site, we can provide you with large exposure on many other websites, such as Realtor.com, Trulia and others, to mention just a few. Of course your property is also listed  on the Nevada County Multiple Listing service.  We also have direct access to all of the Bay Area  MLS’s and beyond, along with most of the Northern California MLS’s. Currently we are working with clients buying property in the Bay Area, along with our clients here in Nevada County.

We want to thank our clients that has helped us to be successful for these many years.

Thinking of buying or selling?
For all your real estate needs
Email or call:

John J. O’Dell Realtor® GRI
Civil Engineer
General Contractor
(530) 263-1091
Email jodell@nevadacounty.com

Enhanced by Zemanta

Why You Should Buy a Home Instead of Renting

home

I never did like to rent a home, it seems like I was just throwing money out the door every month and paying off the landlords mortgage, plus putting some money in his pocket.

I realize that we had a run up in home prices that put almost everyone out of the market or they bought more house than they could have afforded. Times have changed and there are some really good bargains out there.

The bargains are getting so good in Nevada County, that the lower price homes often have multiple offers.  I’ve placed several offers for clients in homes that were from $200,000 to $500,000 below the original price.  Yes, $500,000 that’s not a typo.  A lot of homes are now selling below replacement costs.  It’s time to buy now, to own your home and not pay off some land lords mortgage.

And finally, a home is an investment. When you rent, you write your monthly check and that money is gone forever. But when you own your home, you can deduct the cost of your mortgage loan interest from your federal income taxes, and usually from your state taxes. This will save you a lot each year, because the interest you pay will make up most of your monthly payment for most of the years of your mortgage. You can also deduct the property taxes you pay as a homeowner. In addition, the value of your home may go up over the years. Finally, you’ll enjoy having something that’s all yours – a home where your own personal style will tell the world who you are.

Seeking Foreclosure Help? Be Careful

foreclosure

There is an amazing story in the August 2009 issue of the California Bar Journal about the growing number of complaints against lawyers and law firms offering mortgage help to homeowners. From investigating nine such complaints for all of 2008, the California State Bar is now investigating 391 complaints against 140 attorneys. What is causing this huge increase in the number of borrowers complaining about attorneys?

With the rise in the foreclosure rate over the past few years, it seems that many lawyers have gone into the foreclosure assistance business. Even in states like California, where loan mitigation companies are no longer allowed to charge an up-front fee from borrowers, attorneys can still charge a multiple-thousand dollar retainer fee before any work is done for a homeowner. This makes the foreclosure business very lucrative, and very attractive for the corrupt.

Also, what happened to all of the lawyers providing mortgage services during the boom for lenders, title companies, and home buyers? Many states require that borrowers and sellers both have an attorney at closing to represent them. With the falloff in new closings and refinances, these attorneys may have decided to enter the other side of the business — helping homeowners escape the predatory loans the lawyers should have warned about in the first place.

Many homeowners were given loans that were either misrepresented to them or were simply not explained at all. Too many lawyers hired to make sure the borrowers understood the terms of the contracts did very little other than collect several hundred dollars at the closing table. The law requiring legal counsel before a real estate closing had more to do with injecting unnecessary legal fees into the housing market than creating educated borrowers.

Some of the complaints against these lawyers now providing loan modification services are the same ones homeowners routinely file against loss mitigation companies. Some of the complaints involve no service being provided, up-front fees that are collected but no work is done, no refunds even though no work is done, instructing homeowners to stop contacting their lenders, even attempting to transfer money directly out of a borrower’s bank account.

This indicates that some lawyers have entered the loan modification business essentially just to steal money from desperate homeowners. Too many companies or law firms take payments from borrowers and then never provide any work — it is one of the most common foreclosure scams around, and one that homeowners keep becoming victims of as they try to save their homes.

But none of this really explains the shocking rise in complaints against attorneys offering foreclosure help. From nine in 2008 to close to 400 in the first seven months of 2009, it seems that more factors than just legal industry corruption are involved. Or, have attorneys in large numbers made the move from other less lucrative practices into the foreclosure business, where they can prey off the huge numbers of people struggling to keep their properties?

Source: Article Bliss”

Nicolas Cage Facing Real Estate Liquidation

nicolas-cage

Nicolas Cage, one of my favorite actors, is facing a real estate liquidation sale, having to sell properties he owns all over the world. He has made millions of dollars over a long career, however, he claims his business manager has sent him “down a path toward financial ruin”.

Cage has filed a lawsuit in Los Angles against business manager Samuel Leven. In his lawsuit, Cage states that Leven was so reckless and incompetent with his money that he has been forced to sell off major assets and investments and is face with gigantic tax liabilities.

Cage claimed that his recently-fired business manager had failed to pay taxes when they were due and had placed him in speculative and risky real estate investments “resulting in (the actor) suffering catastrophic losses.”

In the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court and first obtained by celebrity web site TMZ.com , Cage said he had now been forced to “sell major assets and investments at a significant loss” because of the actions of his business advisor and accountant over the past seven years

Consequently, Cage has had to unload two properties in Bath, England, a Bavarian castle he owned in Germany, houses in New York, Las Vegas and California, and his 132-foot yacht.

Cage put his Gray Craig castle in Middletown, R.I., on the market a year ago for $15.7 million but has recently reduced the asking price to something in the neighborhood of $12 million.

The lawsuit said the advisor had also failed to alert Cage to the fact that his money was running out, and had over-extended his lines of credit with banks.

Cage, 45, is one of Hollywood’s most prolific actors with more than 50 movies to his name, including an Oscar-winning role as an alcoholic in “Leaving Las Vegas” and action movies such as “Face/Off” and “Gone in Sixty Seconds”.

Cage earned some $40 million last year according to Forbes .com